Why by necessity? Because sometimes the home or building is so large that the distance between the initial device (which is being used both as a router and an access point) and the other access points is too great for the signal to reach them. not to have a downstream unit have to depend an an already degenerated signal to be repeated. Some people (like me) would like to interconnect their additional access points via Ethernet for purity reasons, i.e. I say that because it’s not emphasized by Google or by most reviewers. Google Wifi: How/why to interconnect units via EthernetĪpparently, most Google Wifi reviewers don’t interconnect up their Google Wifi units via Ethernet. More recently, it is also semi-automated with several mesh systems which are now on the market, one of which is the Google Wifi referenced in the rest of this article. The first of those I ever saw was Apple’s now defunct AirPort system (which managed it rather poorly and never included QoS, an embarrassment for Apple). If offered, those bands can be discretely labeled via the SSID or simply available for a device to choose automatically, in the background, without the user’s intervention or knowledge.Īll of the above has been traditionally accomplished either by patient individuals who know the proper procedure (I have done it dozens of times, and have even been flown to México to do it once so far) or via a semi-automated system. This primary network -may or may not- offer dual-band 2.4 and 5 GHz, depending upon whether it is necessary to provide both bands. Provide adequate coverage throughout the home, office, studio or building (in the case of a hotel or shopping mall) whereby end-users can freely roam within, without the need to be aware s/he is switching between access points, since they all have the same SSID name, password and encryption method, although often are adjusted to be at different frequencies to avoid co-channel interference.In my opinion, any WiFi system of any brand -or combination of brands- should have the following primary and possibly secondary goals: But before that, I’ll clarify the WiFi mission (standard graphical representation, not Google’s). This article is to clarify how -and why- multiple Google Wifi units can be interconnected via Ethernet. This article is not a review, since there is a plethora of them, and Google Wifi is deservedly well regarded in many. USB 2.0 has a maximum transfer rate of 480 megabits (60 megabytes) per second - that is plenty for most day-to-day applications.Google Wifi (Google’s own unique graphical representation for this product, with uppercase W and lowercase F) is the official name of the company’s mesh-capable wireless system. USB 2.0 adapters have a lower maximum throughput than adapters that use USB 3.2 Gen 1 or USB 3.2 Gen 2, but it probably won’t matter for most uses. There are a few basic considerations to keep in mind while picking a USB to Ethernet adapter. Luckily, there are a huge number of adapters available that let you connect an Ethernet cable to a USB port. Most notably, wired connections tend to be more stable, and they’re usually faster. However, there are plenty of reasons to want a wired connection. They primarily rely on modern Wi-Fi networks for their connectivity. Most modern laptops don’t come with dedicated Ethernet ports anymore - they’re simply too bulky to fit into the slim devices we’ve grown accustomed to. Ever more slender laptop designs eschew the Ethernet port these days, but that doesn’t mean you have to go without - here’s how you can get one on any modern laptop. Once upon a time, when laptops were a far bulkier affair, Ethernet ports were standard.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |